Are Scientists Naive?

Are Scientists Naive? | Source List

Roughly in order of appearance

• Mazin, C. (2019). Chernobyl. HBO Entertainment and Sky Atlantic

• Supran, G. and Oreskes, N. (2021). “The forgotten oil ads that told us climate change was nothing”. The Guardian (Climate Crimes).  https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/nov/18/the-forgotten-oil-ads-that-told-us-climate-change-was-nothing

• Hvistendahl,M. (2007). “Coal Ash Is More Radioactive Than Nuclear Waste”. Scientific American (Energy). https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste/

• Ritchie, H. (2020). What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy? Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/safest-sources-of-energy

• Cimons, M. (2023). “No, moderate drinking isn’t good for your health”. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wellness/2023/03/31/moderate-drinking-alcohol-wine-risks/

• Zhao J, Stockwell T, Naimi T, Churchill S, Clay J, Sherk A. Association Between Daily Alcohol Intake and Risk of All-Cause Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(3):e236185. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.6185

• Legg T, Hatchard J, Gilmore AB (2021) The Science for Profit Model—How and why corporations influence science and the use of science in policy and practice. PLOS ONE 16(6): e0253272. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253272

• White, K. (2021). Publication Output by Country, Region, or Economy and Scientific Field. Publications Output: U.S. Trends and International Comparisons, National Science Foundation. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20214/publication-output-by-country-region-or-economy-and-scientific-field

• Buranyi, S. (2017). “Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for 

  science?” The Guardian (The Long Read).  https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science

• Kean, S. (2019). “Historians expose early scientists' debt to the slave trade”. Science Magazine (News). https://www.science.org/content/article/historians-expose-early-scientists-debt-slave-trade

• Kumar et al. 2013. Treatise on the isoptera of the world: introduction. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History (377): P.16, Fig 4

• Galton, F.. (1904). Eugenics: Its Definition, Scope, and Aims. Journal of Sociology (10) 1: 1–25

• Galton, F. (1904). Distribution of success and of Natural Ability Among the Kinsfolk of Fellows of the Royal Society. Nature (70): 1815: 354–356. 

• Allen, G., Carlson, E., Lombardo, P., Micklos, D., Selden, S., and. Witkwoski, J. (n.d.). Eugenics Archive. http://www.eugenicsarchive.org/eugenics/list3.pl

• Parker, G.H. (1915). The Eugenics Movement as a Public Service. AAAS (41) 1053: 342–347. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1640015

• Boas, F. (1916). Eugenics. The Scientific Monthly (3) 5: 471–478. https://www.jstor.org/stable/6055

• Nature. (2022). How Nature Contributes to Science's discriminatory legacy. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-03035-6

• Slattery, J., Thorp, H., and Parikh, S. (2021). “Eugenics and the history of Science and AAAS”.Science (Editor’s Blog). https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/eugenics-and-history-science-and-aaas

• Lyell, C. (1845).  Travels in North America (I): 157–184. 

• Darwin Correspondence Project. “Letter no. 905”. https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-905.xml&query=905

• Darwin, C. (1859). The Origin of Species By Means of Natural Selection. 

  
  

• National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health. Eugenics: It’s Origins and Development (1883–Present). https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/educational-resources/timelines/eugenics

• American Society of Human Genetics Board of Directors. (2023).  On the Report of the ASHG Facing Our History-Building an Equitable Future Initiative. https://www.ashg.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/ASHG-Facing-Our-History-Initiative-Statement-and-Press-Release-NOT-EMBARGOED.pdf

• Becker, Paul. (2017). March for Science, Washington, DC. CC BY 2.0

• Servick, K. (2017). “Skepticism surfaces over CRISPR human embryo editing claims”.  Science (Science Insider: Biology). https://www.science.org/content/article/skepticism-surfaces-over-crispr-human-embryo-editing-claims

• Weil, E. (2023). You Are Not a Parrot And a chatbot is not a human…New York Magazine (Artificial intelligence). https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/ai-artificial-intelligence-chatbots-emily-m-bender.html

• Stahl, L. (2023). “The new world of AI chatbots like ChatGPT”. CBS NEWS (60 Minutes Newsmakers).https://www.cbsnews.com/news/chatgpt-artificial-intelligence-chatbots-60-minutes-2023-03-05/?ftag=CNM-00-10aab7d&linkId=204144948

Other sources: 

Artlist.io

Freesound.org

Pexels.com 

Wikipedia

Paints, photos, images:

• Thomas, N. (1871). "Move on!" Has the Native American no rights that the naturalized American is bound to respect?

• Laurie, R.H. (1821). Tobacco Production. http://www.slaveryimages.org/s/slaveryimages/item/1058

• Clark, W. (1823). Slaves working on a plantation planting the sugar cane

• Faden, W. 1977. Furr Traders in canada trading with indians

• Rugendas, J.M. (1830). Negros at the bottom of the hold

• Remingon, F. (1900). Cornado sets our North

• Harper’s Weekly. (1860). Expulsion of Negroes and abolitionists from Tremont Temple, Boston, Massachusetts